An analysis of autonomy which allows patients the right to make decision of their medical treatment

Differing problems present themselves. She was referred to an antenatal consultant, Miss Kerslake, to discuss the possibility of screening. At issue was respect for her autonomy.

We do not seek, or need, to engage with putative metaphysical proofs relating to freedom of the will for the purposes of this paper. Government within a Shared System Autonomy is a familiar concept within legal, moral, and political philosophy.

The Doctrine of Informed Consent: Section 3 places a premium on information, its understanding, retention, and use in deliberation. Oxford University Press; In this regard, the Mental Capacity Act builds directly on common law doctrine.

The patient believes her blood is evil, and any blood and blood products introduced to her body become evil. Rather, it founds autonomy on reflective, rational decision-making, with no pre-analytic substantive commitments to the good or the right.

The subject of this Essay is not the so-called Liberty of the Will, so unfortunately opposed to the misnamed doctrine of Philosophical Necessity; but Civil, or Social Liberty: And for most people, it seems to be something that is reasonably taken for granted.

Is being autonomous an absolute matter, meaning either one is or is not autonomous, or is it graded or context-specific, meaning one can be more or less autonomous? By wedding autonomy with rationality, as Kantian theory does, and then wedding this to prescriptive social norms, we leave ourselves with a concept that is unassailably entrenched in an exclusive rationality.

The concerns we outline below also apply most strongly to simplified understandings of respect for autonomy that emphasise the value of independence. However, we think they will resonate positively with the values and practices of the countless clinicians who strive to act with integrity 2 and recognise the importance of relationships for good quality care.

Principles of biomedical ethics. They most strongly indict those understandings that put more emphasis on offering and allowing choice than on enabling informed decision-making—most notably the idea that respect for autonomy obliges clinicians to tell patients about health care options then stand back and abide by their choices.

Given this, at times decisions, and thus patients, will be presumed autonomous when they are not so. Whether it is good that people govern themselves, or to what extent they should do so, are many-layered questions.

The core problem is that the courts have emphasised the passing of information to the patient while ignoring her understanding what she has been told.

We acknowledge that it can be argued that real respect for autonomy requires a commitment to philosophical anarchism: J Gen Intern Med. In this basic sense, it is not so much a normative concept as an empirical question: Dworkin, note 4 above; Frankfurt, note 7 above; Ronald Dworkin. To Empower or to Protect?

However, the way the law has been changed to implement the principle is flawed, as demonstrated by a recent case, which we discuss below.

Supporting Patient Autonomy: The Importance of Clinician-patient Relationships

We map these concerns by exploring developments in medical jurisprudence and the Mental Capacity Act Oxford University Press, A Theory of Justice — Revised Edition. To respect the value of autonomous agents, we must permit people to act freely, not merely to reason freely. The patient believes she is worse off with evil blood inside her.

The leading medical law case in this regard is Burke v.

Pardon Our Interruption...

The protection of pluralism leads to a pay off. Although she cannot demand a treatment that her doctor thinks inappropriate, she can decide what is best from what is offered, including no intervention whatsoever.

It therefore has important illustrative value.Parents cannot invoke their right to religious freedom to refuse treatment for a child.


A threat to the community: A patient's refusal of medical treatment cannot pose a threat to the community. Communicable diseases, for instance, would require treatment or isolation to prevent the spread to the general public.

right to refuse medical treatment — is now included in statutory law of many states, particularly including patients’ bill of rights, see, e.g., • California Health & Safety Code § (a)(3) (enacted ) (“Each hospital shall provide. Capacity is a patient’s ability to understand their medical situation and make an informed decision about care after being advised of the risks and benefits of a.

The right of patients to make decisions about their medical care without their health care provider trying to influence the decision is called patient autonomy. Patient autonomy does allow for health care providers to educate the patient, but does not allow the health care provider to make the decision for the patient.

4 I.

Medical Definition of Patient autonomy

THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT A. Autonomy and Informed Consent The right to refuse medical treatment, also known as the right to die, is rooted in the doctrine of informed consent developed by the law and principles of medical ethics. AUTONOMY, LIBERTY, AND MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING.

John Coggon * and José Miola ** * ** Author The existence of the patient’s right to make his own decision, ensuring that patients make their own decisions and supporting them in those choices. They have sought to provide them with the tools necessary to reach autonomous .

An analysis of autonomy which allows patients the right to make decision of their medical treatment
Rated 4/5 based on 19 review